I highly recommend the debut novel by Olivia Wenzel.
“Etwas, das damit einhergeht, eine neue, gesunde Angst in dein Leben zu lassen – eine Angst, tief, wärmer und zerreißender als jede Angst um dich selbst, dein Leben, deine identitären Beffindlichkeiten es je sein könnten: eine Angst, gebunden an eine Liebe, so stark wie alles, was du bisher kanntest, mal 1000.”
“Something that goes hand in hand with a new, healthy fear in your life – a fear that is deep, warmer and more tearing than any fear of yourself, your life, your identity sensitivities could ever be: a fear bound to a love, as strong as anything you knew before, times 1000.”
1000 Serpentinen Angst is the great first novel by Olivia Wenzel. While browsing a bookshop recently, a friend recommended the book to me, especially referring to the book’s treatment of racism experiences of a Black person in Germany. And the novel is about that – in part. It’s also about (Black) life, (Black) joy, (Black) insecurities and (Black) fear in Germany. I was most impressed by the passages on the main character’s struggle with anxiety and the impact the disorder had on her normal life, her friendships and love. I recognized some of it, but the experience of being a Black queer woman in Germany adds extra layers of fear and complexity to the illness.
The story is told through constant dialogues between the main protagonist and a constantly shifting counterpart. The narrative form is fantastic, slightly experimental and really successful in transporting these complexities, more so than an omniscient narrator or inner monologues could. This narration of the protagonists life and her complex relationships, particularly to her loving yet racist grandmother and her ill and mostly absent mother, creates a tremendous pull. Fantastic.
“If I shut my eyes, I can still feel the fire from those days. And if I open my eyes, I still see the fires all around me. I didn’t like the way the world was, and I believe that there need to be some changes about the way the world is.”
John Carlos won bronze in the 200m dash in the 1968 Olympics and, along with
with Tommie Smith,
protested against racism with a raised fist during the medal ceremony. That iconic protest moment happened this week 49 years ago. The quote is from his 2011 memoir.
The smart people at NPR Politics went through Trump’s “Contract with the America Voter,” i.e. his first 100 days plan, to see how feasible is.
For example, here is their analysis of Trump’s plan to gut the Affordable Care Act:
The GOP Congress has already demonstrated its willingness to repeal the insurance tax subsidies and Medicaid expansion portions of the Affordable Care Act, along with the requirement that all Americans have health insurance, using a fast-track legislative maneuver known as “reconciliation” that prevents a Democratic filibuster. President Obama vetoed that measure, but President-elect Trump would presumably sign it. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that could strip health insurance coverage from more than 20 million people – although the change would most likely be phased in over a couple of years. Trump’s replacement plan is less clear. Health savings accounts would allow more people to buy insurance with pre-tax dollars, and selling insurance across state lines might increase competition and reduce prices. But coverage will very likely remain out of reach for many. The requirement that insurance companies provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions cannot be repealed through reconciliation. But preserving that requirement without the individual mandate to purchase insurance could create a costly situation in which people wait until they’re sick to buy coverage.
Trump’s rejection of Obamacare without presenting a true alternative for those insured by the program alone shows that his plan only creates a government of, by and for some people.
In her opening segment last night, after Donald Trump’s horrifying anti-immigrant speech, Rachel Maddow put the rise of Donald Trump and the alt-right into political history context. She argues that when one of the two major parties in the US two party system collapses, and can no longer hold its own weight and position in the (flawed) system, the nasty, racist, anti-immigrant, nativists gain power. In the 18th century, after the collapse of the Whig party, it was the so-called Know-Nothing movement, viciously against the Other of that time, primarily Catholic and Chinese immigrants. Nativism means putting Americans, and only true-blooded Americans, first, above everyone else, and blaming every ill of society on immigrants. Maddow convincingly argues that is what Donald Trump is doing, and that this isn’t new but history repeating itself, and it’s equally scary. Must see TV.
Walking back from the grocery store, I listened to the newest episode of the great NPR podcast Invisibilia. When I returned to my desk and skimmed through the news, I saw just how apropos the episode is. A young Afghan man, a kid really at 17 years, apparently attacked people on a train near Würzburg in Germany, injuring 4, with a knife. Police are investigating, and have found a hand-drawn “ISIS flag;” already the attack is treated
by the police, public, and media like an IS terror attack
The Invisibilia episode is about “flipping the script,” about what psychologists call non-complementary behavior. Our default reaction, our natural instinct if you will, is to respond to something in the same manner: If someone is cold, we are cold in return. If someone is hostile towards us, we respond with hostility. We respond to violence with violence. Non-complimentary behavior works against that default behavior and often leads to surprising, positive results. Non-complementary behavior is at work when it comes to non-violent protests. In the first story on the podcast, the empathetic reaction of a group attacked by a would-be mugger leads to a peaceful resolution of the situation.
Here comes the connection between the podcast and the headline: The main story of the Invisibilia episode comes from Aarhus, Denmark, where the police and city responded to the ‘radicalization’ of young Muslims and their disappearance to Syria not with repression and stigmatization, but by reaching out to the Muslim community and by offering the young people, including those returning from Syria, a place (back) in society through mentoring, social services and a chat over coffee. They flipped the “tough” law and order script and got positive results. You can read more about the story and listen to the episode here: How A Danish Town Helped Young Muslims Turn Away From ISIS.
The ‘flip the script’ response in this case certainly isn’t perfect (nor is the Aarhus police department perfect, probably) but this solution attempt to me seems more feasible and in line with our democratic values than war, building walls, and banning people. This method also takes the wind out of the sails of ISIS and similar groups, who are using the desperation of young Muslims (of color) and our societal rejection as a powerful recruiting and propaganda tool. After all, as one of the police officers in the story says: These young people are dying to belong.
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan agreed that Presidential candidate Donald Trump’s recent comments about an US judge of Mexican heritage are “sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” Ttly. But whatevs: Ryan still supports the orange beacon of the GOP, because party unity etc. Ryan is pretty much admitting that a) party unity and remaining in power is more important than other values and b) the conservative movement accepts, if not outright encourages racism.
It is so incredibly frustrating that this sort of incoherent bullshit is not only alive but still kicking.
Frustrating for me. Terrifying and dangerous for those who will actually be hit by a potential Trump presidency.
In addition to the racism: At what point does it turn into a constitutional issue when a Presidential candidate tries to discredit (and influence) a judge in this aggressive, public manner?