1–2 minutes

read

If this issue [surrounding Arizona’s SB 1062] sounds familiar, it should, because it’s the exact same issue behind two of the most high profile Supreme Court cases being hear this term — Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius. In both of those cases, for-profit businesses object, on religious liberty grounds, to complying with Obama Administration rules increasing access to birth control. One of the most important questions presented by both cases is whether a for-profit corporation can have religious faith at all, and if so, whether it can use that supposed faith as the basis for a legal claim.
[…]
If the Supreme Court is willing to overrule Lee, and to embrace the almost oxymoronic notion that corporations can be people of faith, then there could be little end to business owners’ ability to immunize themselves from the law — so long as they cover their objections to those laws in a religious wrapper.

An Upcoming Supreme Court Case Could Impose Arizona’s Anti-Gay Bill On The Entire Country | ThinkProgress 

I can recommend the article in full, it gives a bit more contexts to the rulings referenced (if you’re interested in that kind of thing.)

This is one of those cases that are hard to understand if you want to hold on to the belief that jurisprudence is neutral and doesn’t favor certain power structures, certain social positions over others. Even then it’s mind-boggling. 


Discover more from CLARITY AND CHAOS

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Thoughts?