Beginning with the inception of photography in the mid-1800s, the proliferation of visual images has placed an increased importance on our culture’s ability to interpret them correctly. The effect of visual images on a culture cannot be understated. Indeed, some critics argue that visual images have become a major source of information about our society and culture. John O’Connor (1990) reminds us of Vachael Lindsay’s characterization of the United States as a “hieroglyphic civilization,” one in which “images-turned-icons” allow us “literally [to] see the fundamental tensions” in culture. Understanding this “hieroglyphic civilization” permits us to identify and analyze our symbols of hate.
1–2 minutes
read
David E. Whillock. “Symbolism and the Representation of Hate in Visual Discourse.” Whillock, Slayden (ed.) Hate Speech. London: Sage (1995) p. 127
Discover more from CLARITY AND CHAOS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thoughts?